viernes, 16 de agosto de 2013

Animal Farm in 2012

Animal Farm in 2012

Allegory has been used by George Orwell by giving a symbolic meaning to all the characters from Animal Farm and the events in which they have participated related to the events that happened during the Russian revolution.

In the second chapter, the rebellion of the animals is directly related to the revolution that the Bolsheviks, represented by the main pigs, committed against Mr. Jones who personifies the Zar, also the Seven Commandments represented ideals like “All animals are equal” which represented a communist utopian desire. In the third chapter, the co-operation of the animals, especially the horses that represent the hard workers, is appreciated as an allegory because unity was also seen in the people during the Russian revolution after the Zar was overthrown. At the same time, the deceits and injustices about the possession of the milk and apples by the pigs are observed and symbolize the management of power during the Bolsheviks’ government. Finally, in the fourth chapter a major event is symbolized, this is the conflict between the animals and the farmers in the “Battle of the Cowshed” which directly represents the battles during Russia’s civil war between the red army (the animals) and the white army (humans).

In my personal opinion, this story is extremely effective as an allegory because the characters and the events are linked to the Russian revolution in all aspects. This story also makes us think about the common mistakes that happened years ago and it helps us not to commit them again.

For the next exercise the theme I chose of Animal Farm was the fight for power and this theme relates to an important current event that is the Civil War in Syria. What is happening is that the Baath government from Syria is now fighting against the opponents of the regime.

 This conflict started some years before; the Baath government has been in power since 1970 and it exerts an authoritarian regime with a monopoly in all the political parties and also it does not allow the Western policy of economy which could help Syria. Hafez al-Assad has been ruling the country since 1970 until his dead in 2000, then in the same year his son was elected as president but the majority of the country does not want this measure. They are against the dictatorship of the Baath government because they enjoy the pleasures of power; they do not control power correctly and also show poor interest in the country. Because of this, the “Syrian National Coalition” was founded to fight for the power of the country. As we can see, power is not used in a fair way as in Animal Farm with the humans. It isn’t the same example but we observe that the abuse suffered by the animals is similar to the one that the Syrian country suffers. Not only the animals, it is also seen in the Russian revolution. The Russians against the Zar regime, the animals against the humans and finally the Syrian country against the Baath government. All of them fight for power, to have it and try to use it in a correct way. In this example, the animals represent the people from Syria because they are all united by a leader who is Ahmad Yarba and similar of what Old Major proposes, the Syrians have been influenced by him and they are making a revolution.






1 comentario:

  1. You have chosen a fascinating subject and drawn very clear links to support your thesis that the events in Syria are part of an ongoing struggle by the majority for fairer treatment. Very good work.

    Always remember that the easiest way to organise your ideas to write effectively is to choose a couple of main points with clear examples and offer concise analysis. This will help focus your argument.

    ResponderEliminar