The economist

Hold on tight

Peru s roaring economy http://www.economist.com/news/americas/21571162-biggest-threats-latin-americas-economic-star-are-overconfidence-and-complacency-hold

The article from the economist was about the actual situation of Gamarra in La Victoria district here in Peru, where there is a lot of money produced along the year , 3 billion at the end of the year in only one shopping center that competes with other shopping centers like the ones in Brazil and all around Latin America. This winnings that are produced in Gamarra affect mamy other companies in Latin america and changes the market because it not only sells in Peru , it exports to other countries like Brazil and the people of brazil s main companies take advantage of Gamarra s products that are not too expensive compared with other products exported by Peru. Well, the market here in Peru is not only mining as the article says, the market of shopping in gamarra although is a place that has a lot of crime, grime and poverty, is a very productive way to increase the economy of the country. The government is going to improve about the situation of gamarra by building a new shopping center that will make that place look better because now is not a good-looking place to buy.

Most of the capital flooding into the country is for direct investment by the companies that sell and buy  products here in Peru. Other things the article say is are about the importance of the education in Peru that can be improved by growing economy that the government can earn. The last thing that the article talk is about the political fragility by Ollanta Humala that is a business man who can improve the situation of the congress and the police that are not in a good situation nowadays.
Concluding, the country should be able to grow 4% or 5% in the next 5 years and this could be achieved by avoiding problems in Peru that include accidents.

 SONY PS3 in the last years

I will talk and comment about sony s aims in the last years with his This Ps3 is a console developed by them and during 2011 and 2012 their aim was to sell 15 million of this consoles . What a huge amount! Yes, this seemed to be easy but then came Xbox360 with its kinect, a new device more cheaper and easy to use than the playstation s move that was its competence.

This hole caused by the competition in the ps3 was affronted by the development of sony features in Ps3 like more games and exclusivity characteristics like netflix or other programs inside the console. The response to this in Microsoft was to low their prices but more people still buy PS3 because mainly of the online features and free multiplayer that it had and in the xbox360 you need to pay.

After 2011 passed, during the 2012 the news of the production of the production of the new Wii U, affected sony because there was a new portable videogame. In response of that, sony developed the Playstation Vita that beat the Wii U. Finally for the 2013 , Sony s aims is to release to market his new PS4!  And because of this release ..Xbox will release their 720. The competition will be fierce this year with the new features.

for more information of last years:
http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/688768/Sony-stands-by-PS3-sales-target-for-201112-despite-economic-worries.aspx
http://www.cnbc.com/id/38644484/Video_Games_Impact_the_Economy_More_Than_You_Think

Combis demand:

In this text i will explain how is the graph about combis and their relationship with other facts. 

 Taxes:  If the government enforces a law to raise taxes for Combi drivers, those taxes  will affect severaly drivers because not only there will be protests and unrest against  the laws of the government, also their costumers will reduce and they may also use other ways of transports because combis price is too high. The demand line of the combis will shift to the right ,this means that the price will go up but the quantity will stay the same, this is not good for combi business because there is a space for them to get to the equilibrium point.

The use of more cars: This fact affects also the demand of combis because with more cars there are two different situations, if these cars are cheaper or some kind of cheaper they will make the demand of the combis shift to the left, producing less consumers for combi business because they will prefer to buy a car that is more expensive but are more safe than combis and in a better situation. Because of this probably Combi business will change and decrease their prices against the purchase of more cars for use. If the cars that are sold are not too cheap , the difference in the demand of combis won t be so big because people will still prefer to use combis because they are cheap.

The Gas price: In this case i have researched that the main fuel of the majority of combis here in Peru is Diesel that is petrol very dangerous for the environment , more than common gas. Well If only the Gas Price is raised, people obviously will prefer to get into combis because normal cars and some taxis work with gas and they won t use them too much because of the Gas price that is increased, they will want more the use of combis. In this case the Combi businees will win , they will take advantage of the increment of normal gas. In a graph, the demand for combis will shift to the right, this means that the new equilibrium point will benefit combi business, they will increase a little their price for combis and more people will still prefer them because the price of gas has increased and combis are still more less. If the Diesel is also increased, well there, the demand of the combis will shift to  the left, making that there will be less consumers and this will affect combi business.

What do you think about the reading ?

Well for me, the reading is telling the truth nowadays because those educational laws that the government said, affect the demand of drugs. If there is less drugs and they have a huge price, it is obvious that the addicts will still buying because they just want them no matter the price but with the education laws, those people can become less addict so there will be less consumers. Drugs are a big market, the people win a lot but is not good for the consumers, they generate health problems and make them addict that causes them to buy drugs and more drugs. Other thing is the drug interdiction opposite of drug education that raises the prices of drugs but as i have said, addicts will still buying them and also there will be more drug-crimes and also stealing because of the raise of the price. I think drug education is the best way to reduce the drug consumers and also the price of them.

Impact of drugs from USA to Peru

The drug market and changes in USA have big impacts in Peru society. That drug that people of USA have, where do yo think they gain it? They have it from Peru! In Peru there are huge producers of drugs that export them to other countries. Mainly we are not a drug affected country but we are huge sellers , we export them at higher prices in Kilos or Tones some times. Those people are rich because of drugs in Peru  and with the drug education and the laws that the USA government says, if they are applied, probably the selling of drugs here in Peru will be reduced because there will be less drug consumers and addicts and also a posibility that drug sellers in Peru can make is to low their prices so it will be easier to people from USA to buy them despite the drug interdiction of USA government. The consequences of drug interdiction and also drug education here in Peru also could be the high reduction of sellers, that will affect some kind of the economy and those people won t have jobs, because of the lack of consumers so they may go to military service that offers a service when you don t do anything. Concluding, the market of drug sellers in Peru will be affected by drug interdiction and education from USA.